Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 1 (fast):
Content search 2:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Assessment for Service Facsimiles - B661130 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Оценка на Сервисные Факсимиле - Б661130 | Сравнить
CONTENTS ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 NOVEMBER 1966
Tech Hats Auditors Level IV Students

ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES

The location of service facsimiles requires a proper listing question, the absence of which can lead to missing the actual service fac or overrunning a lower release grade.

Of the assessment methods, the following should probably be ruled out as an overrun of earlier grades or on the basis of getting a free needle on a previous grade:

1. Slow assessment with ITSA (overrun Grade 0)

2. Assessment by problems (overrun Grade 1)

3. Assessment by parts of existence (overrun Grade 0)

This leaves as acceptable methods:

1. “In this lifetime, what do you use to make others wrong?”

2. “In this lifetime, what do you think your service facsimile is?” (for a Scientologist trained to Level IV)

3. “In this lifetime, what would be a safe solution to….?” (the blank having been obtained by questions given on the tapes to find either a hidden standard or hidden problem).

4. Assessment of a prepared list, using level found, in “In this lifetime, what have you…… (prehav level)?”

The point being not to start out at the beginning by listing a question which OBVIOUSLY WILL NOT RESULT IN FINDING A SERVICE FAC, in which instance the rule of declaring the grade on a floating needle obtained on the list could not possibly apply.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jp.cden